Located in:
- Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP)
At minimum, in the SCSEP stand-alone submission and the SCSEP portion of the Combined State Plan, States should comprehensively cover the following elements.
c. 1. Describe the Localities and Populations for Which Projects of the Type Authorized by Title V Are Most Needed. (20 Cfr 641.325 (d))
Current Narrative:
In reviewing the below Unemployment Statistics for Minnesota Aitkin 8.2%, Cass 9.3%, Clearwater 13.1%, Hubbard 8.6%, Itasca 9.2%, Kanabec 10%, Lake 9.7%, Marshall 9.8%, Red Lake 8.9% will be counties that will have more focus on during the upcoming years and will recommend minor changes to the distribution of authorized positons to the counties with the highest unemployment in the State.
The location of services tend to be in the towns that are county seats or major cities serving as regional hubs for the rural areas. The metro area focuses more on location connections to other service providers. Sub-grantees are often collocated with other service providers, such as Workforce Centers, Colleges, or human service agencies. Location can be critical to address the challenges of inadequate resources to enable program requirements to be met (e.g., few host agencies or employers, lack of employers, lack of transportation, etc.). Nevertheless, all sub-grantees will work to follow and meet the equitable distribution formula released by Department of Labor. Minnesota’s equitable distribution formula ensures rural and urban counties are served equitably. Strategies will include specific host agency recruitment in rural areas that are undeserved.
Experience Works, Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, National Indian Council on Aging and others have a long history of successfully partnering with other service providers to serve as host agencies. Participants are provided community service assignments at many libraries, senior centers, schools and nutrition sites. SCSEP sub-grantees assists with outreach and recruitment efforts and hire participants when possible. They also provide supportive services, such as transportation, medical services, free meals, wellness classes, legal aid, elder-abuse prevention, tax preparation, and socialization, to address barriers to employment.
Minnesota will be working with SCSEP sub-grantees in these areas to develop steps to correct inequities to achieve employment opportunities and equitable distribution. A few strategies are as follows:
• Utilize equitable distribution report provided on www.SCSEPed.org to monitor and track the equitable distribution.
• Develop strategies to address over and underserved areas. Strategies will include the following:
o Recruit host agencies in underserved counties;
o Outreach to participants who have the greatest barriers to employment in underserved areas;
o Enroll more in underserved areas and close enrollments in over served areas and ; and
o Increase specialized training and job development activities in underserved areas.
• Discuss the potential to move state program participants located in over served areas to the national program.
• Advertising within local community papers, utilizing TV PSA’s, providing flyers, pamphlets, and other marketing tools that will aid in educating city/county government agencies;
• Holding face-to-face presentations and discussions with non-profit and for-profit agencies/employers and city/county officials as well as community clubs and organizations whose focus are community improvement and employment for the older population; and
• Continuing to open host agencies within those communities which serve those that are most-in-need and have the greatest barriers to employment and continue to make referrals to other additional resources if available.
As part of the overall State strategy to create career pathways through sector partnerships, the six regions in Minnesota will be required to include SCSEP sub-grantees in their career pathway development models. With Minnesota’s rapidly aging population and many seniors needing to postpone retirement and seeking new work opportunities, it is critical to include all possible workforce participants and the opportunities that may benefit them and businesses. This process will begin to take shape during the first two years of the WIOA plan and will be assessed with the following two years of the WIOA plan.
| Area - | Labor Force | Employment | Unemployment | Unemployment Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aitkin County | 6,849 | 6,290 | 559 | 8.2% |
| Anoka County | 194,170 | 186,270 | 7,900 | 4.1% |
| Becker County | 18,746 | 17,616 | 1,130 | 6% |
| Beltrami County | 24,224 | 22,776 | 1,448 | 6% |
| Benton County | 22,531 | 21,254 | 1,277 | 5.7% |
| Big Stone County | 2,677 | 2,492 | 185 | 6.9% |
| Blue Earth County | 40,105 | 38,679 | 1,426 | 3.6% |
| Brown County | 14,613 | 13,846 | 767 | 5.2% |
| Carlton County | 17,610 | 16,468 | 1,142 | 6.5% |
| Carver County | 55,946 | 53,888 | 2,058 | 3.7% |
| Cass County | 13,650 | 12,383 | 1,267 | 9.3% |
| Chippewa County | 6,968 | 6,528 | 440 | 6.3% |
| Chisago County | 29,640 | 28,058 | 1,582 | 5.3% |
| Clay County | 36,819 | 35,264 | 1,555 | 4.2% |
| Clearwater County | 4,854 | 4,217 | 637 | 13.1% |
| Cook County | 3,050 | 2,875 | 175 | 5.7% |
| Cottonwood County | 5,903 | 5,564 | 339 | 5.7% |
| Crow Wing County | 31,284 | 29,115 | 2,169 | 6.9% |
| Dakota County | 237,712 | 228,973 | 8,739 | 3.7% |
| Dodge County | 11,694 | 11,113 | 581 | 5% |
| Douglas County | 20,101 | 19,179 | 922 | 4.6% |
| Faribault County | 7,380 | 6,983 | 397 | 5.4% |
| Fillmore County | 11,572 | 10,942 | 630 | 5.4% |
| Freeborn County | 16,225 | 15,510 | 715 | 4.4% |
| Goodhue County | 27,193 | 25,979 | 1,214 | 4.5% |
| Grant County | 3,334 | 3,098 | 236 | 7.1% |
| Hennepin County | 688,592 | 665,255 | 23,337 | 3.4% |
| Houston County | 10,773 | 10,175 | 598 | 5.6% |
| Hubbard County | 9,400 | 8,594 | 806 | 8.6% |
| Isanti County | 21,002 | 19,778 | 1,224 | 5.8% |
| Itasca County | 23,346 | 21,196 | 2,150 | 9.2% |
| Jackson County | 6,327 | 6,052 | 275 | 4.3% |
| Kanabec County | 8,991 | 8,096 | 895 | 10% |
| Kandiyohi County | 24,101 | 22,876 | 1,225 | 5.1% |
| Kittson County | 2,449 | 2,308 | 141 | 5.8% |
| Koochiching County | 6,181 | 5,665 | 516 | 8.3% |
| Lac qui Parle County | 3,757 | 3,542 | 215 | 5.7% |
| Lake County | 5,737 | 5,178 | 559 | 9.7% |
| Lake of the Woods County | 2,601 | 2,485 | 116 | 4.5% |
| Le Sueur County | 16,162 | 15,145 | 1,017 | 6.3% |
| Lincoln County | 3,358 | 3,176 | 182 | 5.4% |
| Lyon County | 15,254 | 14,567 | 687 | 4.5% |
| Mahnomen County | 2,481 | 2,333 | 148 | 6% |
| Marshall County | 5,736 | 5,173 | 563 | 9.8% |
| Martin County | 10,421 | 9,926 | 495 | 4.8% |
| McLeod County | 20,271 | 19,253 | 1,018 | 5% |
| Meeker County | 13,507 | 12,713 | 794 | 5.9% |
| Mille Lacs County | 13,265 | 12,198 | 1,067 | 8% |
| Morrison County | 18,082 | 16,660 | 1,422 | 7.9% |
| Mower County | 20,689 | 19,914 | 775 | 3.7% |
| Murray County | 5,090 | 4,731 | 359 | 7.1% |
| Nicollet County | 20,626 | 19,960 | 666 | 3.2% |
| Nobles County | 11,682 | 11,137 | 545 | 4.7% |
| Norman County | 3,394 | 3,176 | 218 | 6.4% |
| Olmsted County | 84,904 | 82,040 | 2,864 | 3.4% |
| Otter Tail County | 30,864 | 28,995 | 1,869 | 6.1% |
| Pennington County | 9,180 | 8,555 | 625 | 6.8% |
| Pine County | 15,077 | 13,909 | 1,168 | 7.7% |
| Pipestone County | 4,933 | 4,676 | 257 | 5.2% |
| Polk County | 17,600 | 16,758 | 842 | 4.8% |
| Pope County | 6,531 | 6,239 | 292 | 4.5% |
| Ramsey County | 284,339 | 273,705 | 10,634 | 3.7% |
| Red Lake County | 2,351 | 2,141 | 210 | 8.9% |
| Redwood County | 8,177 | 7,747 | 430 | 5.3% |
| Renville County | 8,477 | 7,956 | 521 | 6.1% |
| Rice County | 36,079 | 34,562 | 1,517 | 4.2% |
| Rock County | 5,949 | 5,773 | 176 | 3% |
| Roseau County | 8,636 | 7,975 | 661 | 7.7% |
| Saint Louis County | 102,593 | 95,732 | 6,861 | 6.7% |
| Scott County | 80,403 | 77,472 | 2,931 | 3.6% |
| Sherburne County | 50,846 | 48,316 | 2,530 | 5% |
| Sibley County | 8,708 | 8,244 | 464 | 5.3% |
| Stearns County | 90,865 | 86,820 | 4,045 | 4.5% |
| Steele County | 20,537 | 19,666 | 871 | 4.2% |
| Stevens County | 5,654 | 5,452 | 202 | 3.6% |
| Swift County | 5,166 | 4,821 | 345 | 6.7% |
| Todd County | 13,194 | 12,390 | 804 | 6.1% |
| Traverse County | 1,792 | 1,699 | 93 | 5.2% |
| Wabasha County | 12,231 | 11,663 | 568 | 4.6% |
| Wadena County | 6,509 | 5,977 | 532 | 8.2% |
| Waseca County | 9,681 | 9,166 | 515 | 5.3% |
| Washington County | 139,846 | 134,791 | 5,055 | 3.6% |
| Watonwan County | 6,303 | 5,929 | 374 | 5.9% |
| Wilkin County | 3,687 | 3,534 | 153 | 4.1% |
| Winona County | 29,640 | 28,510 | 1,130 | 3.8% |
| Wright County | 73,740 | 70,231 | 3,509 | 4.8% |
| Yellow Medicine County | 5,569 | 5,292 | 277 | 5% |