Located in:
- Career and Technical Education Programs Authorized Under the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006
- d. Accountability and Evaluation
In addition to the narrative information provided below, you must submit your measurement definitions (Items 3 and 11 below) and proposed performance levels (Items 5 and 11 below) for the upcoming program year using the link to the Perkins State Plan Portal below.
- d. Accountability and Evaluation
d. 1. G. You Must Describe the Objective Criteria and Methods You Will Use to Allow an Eligible Recipient to Request Revisions to Its Local Adjusted Levels of Performance if Unanticipated Circumstances Arise with Respect to an Eligible Recipient. (section 113(b)(4)(a)(vi))
Current Narrative:
Because Minnesota has established solid baseline data on performance for several years at both the secondary and postsecondary levels, consortia will be allowed to renegotiate performance only when demonstrating that a significant change has occurred to the population of students for whom data reporting is to occur. Because of the recent change to a new test system for academic performance, however, Minnesota will allow some flexibility for the first two years under Perkins IV to establish trends for academic performance.