U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

2 Year Modification

Plan: Minnesota PYs 2018-2019
Combined Plan C

Section: WIOA State Plan Common Elements

Narrative: II. a. 1. A.

Published
Located in:
  • II. Strategic Elements

    The Unified or Combined State Plan must include a Strategic Planning Elements section that analyzes the State’s current economic environment and identifies the State’s overall vision for its workforce development system. The required elements in this section allow the State to develop data-driven goals for preparing an educated and skilled workforce and to identify successful strategies for aligning workforce development programs. Unless otherwise noted, all Strategic Planning Elements apply to Combined State Plan partner programs included in the plan as well as to core programs.

II. a. 1. A. Economic Analysis (A.I -A.III)

The Unified or Combined State Plan must include an analysis of the economic conditions and trends in the State, including sub-State regions and any specific economic areas identified by the State. This must include-

  • i. Existing Demand Industry Sectors and Occupations

    Provide an analysis of the industries and occupations for which there is existing demand.

  • ii. Emerging Industry Sectors and Occupation

    Provide an analysis of the industries and occupations for which demand is emerging.

  • iii. Employers’ Employment Needs

    With regard to the industry sectors and occupations identified in 1 and 2 above, provide an assessment of the employment needs of employers, including a description of the knowledge, skills, and abilities required, including credentials and licenses.

Current Narrative:

Despite the relatively low numbers, minority-owned firms are growing in number much faster than white owned firms in Minnesota. While white-owned firms declined between 2007 and 2012, minority-owned firms grew by 60.3 percent in Minnesota with revenues up 88.5 percent over the period. Our focus is on targeting and increasing our service capacity to Minnesotans with barriers to employment. In 2014, Minnesotans of color made up 19 percent of the state's population. Individuals from communities of color currently make us one in every four individuals served in our workforce system through universal services and eligibility-based program.

Given the well-documented and unequal unemployment rates by race and ethnicity, we can do more to ensure that communities most in need have access to and participate in our workforce system. This access and participation must also extend to Minnesotans with disabilities and disconnected youth. In 2014, nearly 11 percent of Minnesotans have a disability. These statistics are even greater for the state's Black or African American and American Indian residents. And unemployment rates for individuals with a disability exceed state averages in Minnesota.

Finally, while measures show that Minnesota has the 4th lowest rate among states for disconnected youth - those age 16 to 24 who are neither working nor in school - rates of disconnection are disproportionate by race and ethnicity. Minneapolis-St. Paul metro data show a 16.6 percent disconnection rate among Black of African Americans versus 7.7 percent for whites. Regional profiles have been made available to each of the workforce development regions. Additional information and analysis will be provided to each region as requested.

Gender and Minnesota’s Workforce

As Minnesota’s economic growth continues to test the capacity of workforce development, it has become increasingly important to look at all aspects of ensuring a robust talent pipeline. The talent pipeline must encourage all career and job seekers to consider all the opportunities for career pathways that lead to family sustaining wages. Minnesota has one of the highest labor force participation rates in the country and provides ample access to the workforce development system for both women and men. The following chart provides an overview of basic labor market information by gender and racial categories:

Minnesota Employment Characteristics, 2016

Employment Characteristics by GenderPopulation, 16 & overIn Labor ForceLabor Force Partic. RateUnemployed WorkersUnemp. Rate
Total4,375,5233,040,52469.5%116,5183.8%
Male2,162,0021,585,67473.3%68,0314.3%
Female2,213,5211,454,85065.7%48,4873.3%
Employment Characteristics by RacePopulation, 16 & overIn Labor ForceLabor Force Partic. RateUnemployed WorkersUnemp. Rate
White alone3,750,6332,602,93969.4%83,2943.2%
Black or African American alone228,798155,35467.9%16,62310.7%
American Indian & Alaska Native alone44,18326,42159.8%3,38212.8%
Asian or Other Pac. Islanders alone193,451137,54471.1%5,3643.9%
Some Other Race alone75,52258,90778.0%3,2405.5%
Two or More Races81,72959,82673.2%4,7868.0%
Employment Characteristics by Hispanic OriginPopulation, 16 & overIn Labor ForceLabor Force Partic. RateUnemployed WorkersUnemp. Rate
Hispanic or Latino (of any race)187,733143,24076.3%9,1676.4%
Employment Characteristics by DisabilityPopulation, 16 & overIn Labor ForceLabor Force Partic. RateUnemployed WorkersUnemp. Rate
With Any Disability291,686152,26052.2%12,1818.0%

Source: 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

At this level, labor force participation and unemployment rates are relatively equal by gender. The disparities continue to be primarily reflected in characteristics by race and disability. Furthermore, a breakout of characteristics for women by ethnicity demonstrate continued inequities along racial lines as highlighted in the following table.

Rates By EthnicityWhiteBlackAsianHispanicAI
H.S. Diploma95.8%77.5%74.9%65.7%85.8%
Unemployment2.7%11.0%2.9%6.9%8.4%
Median Earnings45,72033,37342,05030,59036,970
Poverty18.7%39.3%20.7%34.1%38.2%
Labor Participation65.5%66.3%65.6%69.8%64.7%
Bachelor's or Higher36.0%20.7%41.7%17.0%21.0%

Source: 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

However, at a deeper level, looking at industry sectors and occupations, a different trend emerges. The following table illustrates gender inequities, highlighting the top 10 occupations dominated by female and male employment.

EmploymentPercent of TotalEmploymentPercent of Total
Total, All Occupations1,515,56151.9%1,406,08548.1%
Female-dominated occupations MaleFemale
Preschool and kindergarten teachers1200.9%13,38799.1%
Occupational and physical therapist assistants and aides703.0%2,24897.0%
Secretaries and administrative assistants3,1685.7%52,41094.3%
Bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing clerks1,9728.6%21,03191.4%
Personal appearance workers1,9379.6%18,32090.4%
Child care workers3,1799.8%29,28990.2%
Special education teachers72310.1%6,44589.9%
Registered nurses7,72111.2%61,13588.8%
Other healthcare support occupations2,76211.3%21,73088.7%
Legal support workers1,17913.8%7,38286.2%
Male-dominated occupations MaleFemale
Extraction workers1,34399.5%70.5%
Rail and water transportation workers2,13599.3%150.7%
Carpenters24,11898.9%2711.1%
Vehicle and mobile equipment mechanics, installers, and repairers32,32498.9%3761.1%
Pipe layers, plumbers, pipefitters, and steamfitters9,53298.5%1441.5%
First-line supervisors of construction and extraction workers11,87697.4%3192.6%
Construction laborers26,69196.7%9223.3%
Electricians12,35296.6%4393.4%
Material moving workers except supervisors, laborers and material movers, hand12,12395.6%5634.4%
Other construction workers and helpers8,02694.6%4605.4%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

The industry sectors selected by the six regions included many of the following occupations where male employment is predominant, presenting gender inequities that may be impeding the robust talent pipeline Minnesota seeks to establish through our WIOA strategies.

Minnesota Occupations by GenderMaleFemale
EmploymentPercent of TotalEmploymentPercent of Total
Total, All Occupations1,515,56151.9%1,406,08548.1%
Extraction workers1,34399.5%70.5%
Rail & water transportation workers2,13599.3%150.7%
Vehicle & mobile equipment mechanics, installers, & repairers32,32498.9%3761.1%
Carpenters24,11898.9%2711.1%
Pipe layers, plumbers, pipefitters, & steamfitters9,53298.5%1441.5%
First-line supervisors of construction & extraction workers11,87697.4%3192.6%
Construction laborers26,69196.7%9223.3%
Electricians12,35296.6%4393.4%
Material moving workers except supervisors & laborers & material movers, hand12,12395.6%5634.4%
Other construction workers & helpers8,02694.6%4605.4%
Driver/sales workers & truck drivers62,92094.3%3,8375.7%
Plant & system operators4,97594.0%3186.0%
Other installation, maintenance, & repair occupations including electrical & electronic equipment mechanics, installers, & repairers40,96893.8%2,6886.2%
First-line supervisors of landscaping, lawn service, & grounds keeping workers2,71293.7%1836.3%
Fishing & hunting, & forest, conservation, & logging workers1,13892.9%877.1%
Grounds maintenance workers16,95491.2%1,6378.8%
Metal workers & plastic workers37,79990.9%3,7809.1%
Firefighting & prevention workers2,12290.8%2169.2%
Painters & paperhangers7,85990.2%8589.8%
Woodworkers4,57789.9%51710.1%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 American Community Survey

Disability by gender information provides limited insights, due to data surpression requirements. Overall, the data does show the disparities for those with disabilities. Females, in general, also trail behind men in one known category - median earnings - and it can some what be inffered that this would hold true in the other characteristics.

Outcomes - Disability by Gender

-WITH DISABILITIESWITH DISABILITIESWITH DISABILITIES
CharacteristicsTotalMaleFemale
HS Diploma85.5%--
Unemployment8.0%--
Median Earnings (total)$19,767$21,914$16,767
Poverty18.3%--
Labor Force Participation52.2%--
Bachelor's or Higher18.5%--

Inequities exist for both males and females by race. The following two tables show the outcomes by gender and race.

Outcomes - Male by Race

CharacteristicsTotalWhiteBlackAsianHispanicNative American
HS Diploma92.6%94.3%85.8%82.8%59.8%86.1%
Unemployment4.3%3.7%10.5%4.8%6.0%16.0%
Median Earnings (total)$41,616$44,597$26,969$37,042$28,009$22,828
Median Earnings (full-time, year-round)$53,200$55,990$37,235$50,579$35,291$36,319
Poverty9.0%6.5%28.1%15.9%15.3%32.9%
Labor Force Participation73.3%73.3%69.5%77.1%82.2%61.0%
Bachelor's or Higher33.7%34.7%22.9%42.7%13.5%10.5%

Outcomes - Female by Race

CharacteristicsTotalWhiteBlackAsianHispanicNative American
HS Diploma93.3%95.8%77.5%74.9%65.7%83.6%
Unemployment3.3%2.7%11.0%2.9%6.9%10.0%
Median Earnings (total)$30,787$31,605$21,797$30,299$21,055$23,321
Median Earnings (full-time, year-round)$44,132$45,720$33,373$42,050$30,590$35,492
Poverty10.8%8.2%31.5%16.1%21.0%30.3%
Labor Force Participation65.7%65.5%66.3%65.6%69.8%58.7%
Bachelor's or Higher35.9%37.2%18.5%40.8%17.0%17.0%

1-Year Estimates

Gender equity presents an opportunity for further strategy development as Minnesota considers a variety of aspects for its workforce analysis in building and sustaining a robust talent pipeline to meet the needs of employers. From an economic perspective of family sustain wages - the focus of goal number one in the State Plan - gender inequities are more prevalent along racial lines. From a Career Pathway perspective of employment opportunity that meet the needs of industry - the focus of goal number two in the State Plan - gender inequities exist that appear to limit opportunities for women and a more robust talent pipeline for employers.

Ethnic Subcategories

Minnesota's regions also contain various ethic groups within the larger subgroups presented elsewhere in this section. To assist the regions with this issue the State Board and DEED will provide more detailed breakouts of these populations. The following tables illustrate some of these breakouts within Asian and Native Americans groups in Minnesota.

Asian

HmongAsian IndianVietnameseChineseFilipinoKoreanBurmese
Poverty StatusNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercent
Less than 100% of poverty12,92116.8%4,3298.0%3,98912.4%7,11025.2%1270.8%3,53024.1%6,29448.3%
100-199% of poverty level1815923.6%1,7083.2%3,24710.1%4,90117.4%2,83017.8%2,04213.9%4,05831.2%
200% or more of poverty level4584659.6%48,13388.9%24,97477.5%16,21457.4%12,97381.4%9,07862.0%2,67520.5%
Native American
ChippewaSiouxAm. Indian/Alaskan, tribe not reported
Poverty StatusNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercent
Less than 100% of poverty13,11132.6%1,90824.5%4,13852.9%
100-199% of poverty level11,07327.6%2,49232.0%1,64221.0%
200% or more of poverty level15,98739.8%3,38543.5%2,04826.2%